Jump to content

Talk:Yoga

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleYoga has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 3, 2006WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
April 17, 2007Good article nomineeListed
August 15, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
July 21, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

Semi-protected edit request on 5 June 2024

[edit]
Shivani1801 (talk) 10:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

16 Science - Based Benefits of YOGA

 Not done: as you have not requested a specific change in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
More importantly, you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, the website you have linked to is a blog, not something from a reliable publisher with a reputation for fact-checking. - Arjayay (talk) 11:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

English IPA

[edit]

@Theknightwho you didn't address my last edit summary. I've already explained why DUALPRON doesn't apply here. Rolando 1208 (talk) 03:10, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 13 September 2024

[edit]

Yoga is also considered a sport that helps people lose weight. 14.248.212.5 (talk) 01:22, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - No WP:RS source was offered for either topic. This is the section on potential health effects, which neither describes yoga as a sport nor indicates any weight loss effect. Zefr (talk) 01:34, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Unification with the Divine"

[edit]

Patanjali's classical definition

[edit]

@Stormbird: kaivalya is the classical definition of yoga. Yoga sutras of Patanjali, as quoted in the body of the article:

1.2. yogas chitta vritti nirodhah – "Yoga is the calming down the fluctuations/patterns of mind"
1.3. Then the Seer is established in his own essential and fundamental nature.
1.4. In other states there is assimilation (of the Seer) with the modifications (of the mind.

Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 09:36, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citing primary sources selectively is not sufficient to challenge the removal of the content.
The content in dispute that you added to the article:
“aim to control (yoke) and still the mind, recognizing a detached witness-consciousness untouched by the mind (Chitta) and mundane suffering (Duḥkha).”
This statement sounds Buddhist and is actually based on a Buddhist technique and philosophy.
The following content, which I prefer, better reflects Wikipedia's policies:
“In Indian traditions, yoga is a practice of spiritual and ascetic discipline aimed at controlling the mind and body, ultimately seeking spiritual purification and self-awareness, leading to samadhi (absorption) or the union of the soul with the absolute or the Divine.” [Note that samadhi is a common goal in Buddhism, Jainism, and Hinduism.]
This aligns with how yogic traditions and scholars generally describe yoga. Stormbird (talk) 11:02, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Patanjali is said to be influenced by Buddhism, but kaivalya is pure samkhya. Anyway, the second sentence says (emphsis mine) "There is a wide variety of schools of yoga, practices, and goals. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 14:46, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
While I agree with Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! on some points such as the importance of

"yogas chitta vritti nirodhah – Yoga is the calming down the fluctuations/patterns of mind",

However, the first sentence is not the place to debate or translate very complex concepts we need a more readable and neutral version as per WP:LEAD and WP:First paragraph. And Stormbird's version is more concise and readable as per WP guidelines.
But, lets try to develop a balance between detailed accuracy and summarized readability.
In my readings, kaivalya is more often mentioned in Jainism than Hinduism, and it has been importanty mentioned by Patanjali Yoga Sutras, but still it may not be needed in first few sentences.
The 34 Yoga Sutras of Patanjali of the fourth chapter deal with impressions left by our endless cycles of birth and the rationale behind the necessity of erasing such impressions. It portrays the yogi, who has attained kaivalya RogerYg (talk) 02:49, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can suggest some minor edits in the current version as below:
Yoga (/ˈjoʊɡə/; Sanskrit: योग, lit. 'union' Sanskrit pronunciation: [joːɡɐ] ⓘ) is a group of physical, mental, and spiritual practices or disciplines which originated in ancient India and aim to control and still the mind, recognizing a detached self-awareness going beyond mundane suffering (Duḥkha). There are a wide variety of schools of yoga, practices, and goals[1] in Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism,[2][3][4] and traditional and modern yoga is practiced worldwide.[5]

References

  1. ^ White 2011, p. 2.
  2. ^ Denise Lardner Carmody, John Carmody (1996), Serene Compassion. Oxford University Press US. p. 68.
  3. ^ Stuart Ray Sarbacker, Samādhi: The Numinous and Cessative in Indo-Tibetan Yoga. SUNY Press, 2005, pp. 1–2.
  4. ^ Tattvarthasutra [6.1], see Manu Doshi (2007) Translation of Tattvarthasutra, Ahmedabad: Shrut Ratnakar p. 102.
  5. ^ "Yoga: How did it conquer the world and what's changed?". BBC News. 22 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2021.
RogerYg (talk) 03:13, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The first sentence is the place to introduce the topic, also when it may seem complex. The EB-article on kaivaya doesn'teven mention Jainism. And why would you drop "untouched by the mind"? It's an essential element.
Regarding [[:samadhi] as "unification with the Divine"," as proposed by Stormbird, that's but one understanding, and not the most accurate one. And remember that both Hinduism and (some strands of Buddhism) teach that we already are, or are unseparated from, the Divine, but are not aware of it. We and the Divine are not two different things, but one; and we already are united with it. Note also that most descriptions stop short with "samadhi," but miss the essential next part: recognising Purusha, the witness-consciousness, as one's essential or true 'identity'. That's what stilling the mind and samadhi is about: recognizing who or what you really are, when you're not hindered by thoughts and desire. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 04:13, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@RogerYg@Joshua Jonathan The version I suggested, based on how Oxford's Premium Dictionary defines yoga, doesn't say that samadhi is the union of the soul and the divine, as Joshua says. It simply says that the goal of yoga in Indian religions is self-purification and self-knowledge, leading to either samadhi or the union of the soul with the Absolute. This is a better way to describe yoga in an encyclopedic way than what the current version says. Yoga is not just about calming the mind (as in Buddhism), it is also about controlling the physical body.
We should avoid using complex and technical phrases like recognizing a detached witness-consciousness untouched by the mind (Chitta), and go by how scholars generally describe yoga. In yogic traditions, yoga is generally thought of as a means of attaining samadhi, or union with the ultimate principle or God. How Patanjali or the Mahabharata or the Upanishads define yoga is a topic reserved for the body of the article.
Here are some scholarly entries on yoga:
"In general, the purpose of Yoga is to attain Union with Brahman."[1]
"[Yoga] Term used for a number of Hindu disciplines to aid the union of the soul with God.[2]
"The term yoga is derived from the Sanskrit for “joining” or “yoking.” As a discipline, it takes many forms leading to extreme focusing of one's physical and mental powers and to consciousness raising and liberation ( Moksha ) from samsara or—ultimately and ideally—to a “joining” with Brahman."[3]

References

  1. ^ Macshane, Frank (1964). "Walden and Yoga". The New England Quarterly. 37 (3). New England Quarterly, Inc.: 322–342. ISSN 0028-4866. JSTOR 364034. Retrieved 2024-09-22.
  2. ^ Oxford World encyclopedia. 2004. ISBN 978-0-19-954609-1.
  3. ^ Oxford University Press 2005.
This is the most important view on the subject of yoga and should be given its due weight in the lead section.
“In Indian traditions, yoga is a practice of spiritual and ascetic discipline aimed at controlling the mind and body, ultimately seeking spiritual purification and self-awareness, leading to samadhi (absorption) or the union of the soul with the absolute or the Divine.”
This version that better reflects Wikipedia's policies. Stormbird (talk) 09:59, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The WP:LEAD summarizes the article. We have a section on Yoga#Definitions in classical texts; the 'classical' definition given in the lead is based on this section. Before you add a 'general' definition to the lead, you should first try to gain consensus for a 'general' definition in the body of the article. Such a section should certainly also mention that scholars have widely diversely views on such a 'general' definition, given the wide range of traditions. Regarding the sources you provided:
  • MacShane (1964): Buddhists, but also Saivists, will certainly disagree that 'union with Brahman' is the goal of yoga. See, for example, Karen O'Brien-Kop, Rethinking 'Classical Yoga' and Buddhism: Meditation, Metaphors and Materiality, p.1;
  • Oxford World Encyclopedia: yoga is not limited to Hinduism;
  • World Mythology, Oxford Universty Press (2005), union with Brahman: see MacShane.
Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 12:03, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As both Feuerstein and Olsson explain, stilling the mind and recognition of the witness-consciousness, Patanjali's definition, is the classical definition of yoga. Unification with the highest Self (paramatman), Brahman, or God, is the other classical definition, based on the Bhagavad Gita and Vedanta. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 05:26, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yoke

[edit]

Based on above discussion, there is at least no consensus to include additional translation "yoke" in the opening first sentence, where "union" is a more widely accepted translation, and as per MOS:LEADCLUTTER, we need to avoid multiple translations in first sentence. RogerYg (talk) 06:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RogerYg:
  • Regarding Based on above discussion - how do you read the 'discussion above'? You skipped "The term yoga is derived from the Sanskrit for “joining” or “yoking”", from The Oxford Companion to World Mythology? A few cherrypicked sources which one-sidedly define the goal of yoga as 'union with the Divine', ignoring the most basic definition of yoga, namely that of Patanjali's Yoga Sutras as explained by Feuerstein, among others, is a very poor argument to remove diff the basic translation of yoga as 'yoke' from the lead.
  • Regarding consensus, "yoke" has been there for years; you have absolutely no consensus to remove this.
  • Regarding additional translation, it's not an additional translation, it's the main translation; "union" isn't even mentioned in the etymology section.
  • Regarding MOS:LEADCLUTTER, it says

Do not overload the first sentence by describing everything notable about the subject. Instead, spread the relevant information out over the entire lead. Avoid cluttering the first sentence with a long parenthetical containing items like alternative spellings and pronunciations: these can make the sentence difficult to read. This information should be placed elsewhere.

Giving the most essential translation of yoga is not "describing everything notable about the subject"; it's the basis. Selectively removing one of two or three possible translations is even worse.
Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 07:17, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with Joshua Jonathan here. The link between yoga and yoking is central to the subject; scholars such as Mallinson discuss in detail what exactly is being "yoked" when yoga is practised. The article cannot exist without a clear statement of the etymology and the relationship to yoking. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:17, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agee with Joshua. In yoga, the term yoke refers to the concept of union or connection. The word "yoga" itself comes from the Sanskrit root "yuj", which means "to yoke" or "to join." It signifies the practice of bringing together various elements—mind, body, spirit, and consciousness—into a harmonious and unified whole. The metaphor of a yoke, which traditionally connects oxen to a plow, is also used to describe how yoga connects the individual self (Jivatman) with the universal self (Paramatman) or the divine. DangalOh (talk) 12:46, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Connect" is indeed much better than union; "union" implies some sort of symbiosis. Thanks! Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 12:55, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kaivalya

[edit]

On the previous issue on "Kaivalya", its mentioned in many Jainism books that Mahavir achieved Kaivalya. It seems Wikipedia page Kaivalya is incomplete, and missing many aspects from Jainism. See Kevala jnana also known as Kaivalya, means omniscience in Jainism and is roughly translated as complete understanding[1] or supreme wisdom.[2]

References

  1. ^ Sharma 1991, p. 49
  2. ^ Kumar 2001, p. 3

RogerYg (talk) 06:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a basic term in samkhya, and thus also yoga philosophy. See, for example, Jane Wiesner (2015), Freedom Beyond Conditioning: East-West, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, p.60 (White, Yoga in Practice, p.79; idem, p.8: "also employed in Jain soterology."). Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 08:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Yoga&oldid=1247474751"